LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:20:43 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAD7FD68B72C4B454E591EC38"
From: Arno Trautmann <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (480 bytes) , signature.asc (261 bytes)
Will Robertson wrote:
> On 20/09/2010, at 11:27 PM, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
>> is there actually any need for the :nnn etc versions?
> Not sure, is there?
> They seem natural to me; better than nesting multiple :nn commands for more than two ‘and’ branches, say.

But then you’re lost at five ”and“. What about, say
\bool_and_p:n {\bool1,...,\booln}
i.e. a list of boolean expressions? (Just for the interface, no idea how
to implement this in an efficient way)