LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Robin Fairbairns <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 12:54:10 +0100
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Jun 1997 12:42:20 -0000." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (24 lines)
Michel Lavaud writes:

> The structure of the document in its first stages is indicated
> with punctuation marks, and typesetting indications such as
> \smallskip, \hspace{2cm}, \bf or whatever extend the set of
> punctuation marks available, and provide a convenient visual way
> to refine the structure. This mimicks exactly what one does when
> writing an article by hand.

This is a wind-up, right?  Or do people _really_ do this sort of
thing?

The structure of a document is (for me) indicated in its first stages
by the text, pure and simple, together with whatever fundamental
layout is defined for the class of document I'm writing.  I find it
easier to concentrate on what I'm writing, that way.

As a final stage, I may tweak things with explicit layout
instructions, but *never* at the start.  This process is called
"editing".  I do quite a lot of that for things I've not myself
written, too   ;-)

R

ATOM RSS1 RSS2