LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 23:27:45 +0930
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (29 lines)
On 07/09/2008, at 11:14 PM, Joseph Wright wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Is there a reason expl3 has
>
> \clist_put_right:Nx
> \clist_put_left:Nx
>
> but no
>
> \clist_gput_right:Nx
> \clist_gput_left:Nx
>
> when the other (non-expanded) variants are all available as gpu and  
> put
> variations?  As it stands, I have to use \clist_put_right:Nx for a
> global list: not good.

I agree. l3seq and l3tlp exhibit similar inconsistencies. Since it's  
hardly any extra code to include in the base package, I'd argue for  
extending most of these functions to support as many variants as  
reasonably possible -- and to be consistent between modules, as well.

I've got to run now, but I'll take a look at fleshing these out over  
the next couple of days.

Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2