Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:50:23 +1100
I for one consider a change like this to be inevitable.
(I just didn't want to be the first one to say so.)
But the question then arises: why e-TeX? Why not Omega, an
e-TeX/Omega hybrid, . . . ?
We could argue about which is `closest' to TeX (passes the TRIP test
and/or some other measures) but for LaTeX, why not go as far away as
possible? If we are calling it LaTeX 3 and even _considering_
changing the underlying program, why not pick one (whether it exists
right now or _could_ exist once we decide exactly what we want) that
addresses most/all of the issues raised by all the years of experience
with the current LaTeX implementation?
I can think of good arguments for both extremes; this question seems
to be more political than technical.
Richard Walker [log in to unmask]
Department of Computer Science Phone: (02) 6125 3785
The Australian National University Intl: +61 2 6125 3785
Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia Fax: +61 2 6125 0010