LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:52:38 +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Subject:
From:
Timothy Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
On Thursday 17 July 2003 11:10, Torsten Bronger wrote:

> Surprisingly enough, TeX is the most serious limitation at the
> moment (of course also because it's so vital).  It's still the best
> back-end for typesetting something, however its treatment of
> so-called special characters, lack of true unicode support, and the
> distinction text/math mode is really unfortunate.

Wouldn't "true unicode support" require fonts with 64000 glyphs?

And isn't it quite sensible to distinguish between text and maths?

--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
tel: +353-86-233 6090
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2