## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

 Options: Use Classic View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

 Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Arrays From: Volker Schubert <[log in to unmask]> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 13:12:40 +0200 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]> Parts/Attachments: text/plain (31 lines) Thank you for your replies! I didn't know that there are tabular-packages which are capable of inserting minimal vertical space between the lines. Maybe one of these packages (resp. certain concepts) should be built into LaTeX3 to set a standard and to prevent incompatible packages. (But who decides which one?) (With arbitrary preambles for the horizontal alignment'' I meant, that one should have a preamble-syntax just like with the array-environment.) Now to the problem of \displaystyle in every column. David and Donald suggested to use \displaystyle as the argument of an everymath''-command. This is a solution but it might cause side-effects if one uses text inside the array: \begin{array}{ll} & \Hom(M,\sum_i V_i) =& \sum_i\Hom(M,V_i) ,\quad\mbox{since $M$ is $(\bigoplus_i V_i)$-projective} \end{array} Here an explanation appears inside a calculation. The calculation should be printed in \displaystyle, but not the little' math-symbols in the explanation. I often use constructions of this form. Wouldn't it be better to introduce something like \everycolumn{}''? Volker `