LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:38:37 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Will Robertson wrote:
> Hmmm. Well.
> 
> I suppose it's out of the question to have both options, where
> ">{\processor}" is a shorthand for, say, ">> \l_xparse_arg_toks
> {\processor}". Or have ">*{\processor}" that uses \l_xparse_arg_tl instead.
> 
> Both of these solutions seem to be more like avoiding the issue than
> solving it :) They certainly don't help simplify the situation.

As I said, I'd be happy to avoid the issue entirely if there is a way to
not need a return variable. However, as a processor can do essentially
anything, I can't see a way to avoid it.
--
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2