LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Font encodings
From: Lars Hellström <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:27:14 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (14 lines) 
At 08.04 +0100 2001-02-21, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
>I think that the use of texual glyphs in the TS encodings is actually wrong
>for the very same reason that you pointed out that encodings like LY1 need not
>have all the symbols. as long as we only have T1 and TS1 that might be
>approrpiate, but better would be to have a text encoding covering other
>languages not covered by T1.

Yes, I did mean it as a temporary measure (to use T1 + accent from TS1).
One shouldn't forget the merit in accustomizing users to the existence of
this accent by providing a working command for it, even if the full
language support will have to wait.

Lars Hellström

ATOM RSS1 RSS2