LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Timothy Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Nov 1998 14:57:16 +0000
In-Reply-To:
<v03110701b264e9f56400@[130.237.37.58]>; from Hans Aberg on Tue, Nov 03, 1998 at 07:02:01PM +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
On Tue, Nov 03, 1998 at 07:02:01PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:
>
>   Returning to TeX and LaTeX, I think that we will have to wait for
> suitable extensions of TeX instead of hoping for an implementation via the
> Godel theorem. :-)

Apologies for asking a very elementary question,
but is the problem in this case that one gets into difficulty
if one says \quote{...\quote{...}...} ?
Would there still be difficulty if one said
\quote{...\inquote{...}...} ?
Ie is it the nesting of \quote that causes the problem ?

If so, it would seem to me to be simpler
to require use of \inquote or whatever
rather than re-creating the universe.

--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
tel: +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2