LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:31:47 +0930
text/plain (13 lines)
On 15/04/2011, at 9:52 AM, Bruno Le Floch wrote:

>>> * These should probably be consistent.
>>> * I think returning a quark is dangerous in case of sloppy package
>>> authors.
> 
> From the seq point of view, I like the idea of \seq_pop:NNF, with a
> \seq_pop:NN variant for an expl3-provided error.

We seem to be in large agreement on this particular point (speak up if not), so let's pencil it in to be incorporated into the revisions to seq.

-- Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2