LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:32:04 -0600
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> (message from Joseph Wright on Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:15:21 +0000)
Content-Type:
text/plain
From:
Karl Berry <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
    Yes, ltunicode is a direct replacement for unicode-letters. Everything
    the latter does is covered by ltunicode.

Great, thanks.

    Yes. (We could happily make ltunicode loadable by plain, but that might
    not be that helpful.)

I was wondering about that.  It actually sounds like a good thing in
terms of maintenance to me.  I would make a physical copy inside TL so
that all of LaTeX is not pulled in for it, but having only one file,
generated in one way, sounds preferable, if it's easy enough to do.

    Both EastAsianWidth.txt and LineBreak.txt have a version which we've
    talked about copying in to the processed file. Regrettably, there is
    no version in UnicodeData.txt:

Yes, that's why I suggested something else :).  I think it's also quite
possible that Unicode has released ("updated") differing files with the
same version number.  Unicode versions in general are a hard problem.

Thanks,
K

ATOM RSS1 RSS2