LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"William F. Hammond" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Feb 2001 23:33:55 -0500
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> I suspect that most serious production users of hyperref uses pdftex anyway,
> for other reasons. thats my personal experience, ie there is almost no
> reason for sticking with dvi + dvips.[1] but I have no solid evidence that
> other people feel the same

Is it even sensible to put anchors in DVI without having anchors
supported there properly, i.e., apart from specials?

                                    -- Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2