LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:39:33 +0000
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Chris Rowley <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
I am polishing up my crystal ball but it is not working as well as Robin's!!

(see, I can be even briefer)

chris

-----Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]> wrote: -----


To: [log in to unmask]
From: Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 11/02/2010 00:22
Subject: Re: LaTeX3 8-bit only?

On 11/02/2010, at 10:41 AM, Robin Fairbairns wrote:

> i thought philipp was suggesting that the luatex 2012 date may present a
> final window of opportunity for latex.  the real point is that there
> _needn't_ be a "physical" causal relationship between luatex and latex 3
> for the final advent of luatex to kill of the ambitions of latex 3.

Are we talking about "LuaTeX" or "ConTeXt Mk IV"? That's an entirely different discussion, and one in which I'm much less qualified to comment.

-- Will
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2