LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:03:51 +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On 17/10/2013 15:19, Alexander Grahn wrote:
> Consider the following example:
> 
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{xparse}
> 
> \begin{document}
> \ifdefined\includegraphics
>   \typeout{Package `graphics' was loaded.}
> \fi
> \end{document}
> 
> Why das xparse load graphics? What is it used for?
> 
> Alexander

As Lars notes, it's expl3 rather than xparse that loads graphics.

At present, we don't use out 'native' graphics drivers by default for
scaling/rotation/... as part of l3box/l3coffins. As such, we rely on
graphics to do the back-end work. There is an open issue on this,
suggesting we switch to 'native' as standard with the LaTeX2e drivers as
an option. That might be a good idea as it means they get a proper
workout and also as clipping is only available with the native drivers.
The main downside is that we have fewer drivers than graphics does, so
would still need a fall-back for example for tex4ht.
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2