LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Frank Mittelbach <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:48:34 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Torsten Bronger writes:
 > Thank you for this link.  I wasn't aware of it, and not of this
 > \relax necessity.  So is it better that I generate
 > \begin{eqnarray}\relax instead of just \begin{eqnarray}?

no that would be wrong, \relax generates a mathord and this is precisely
why you can't define commands in TeX to go

 \relax\iffmode...

as this messes up spacing. anyhow i'm not sure why you would want to have a
\relax there (and eqnarry is inferior for doing serious math compared to the
amsmath environments)

frank

ATOM RSS1 RSS2