LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Date:
Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:22:58 -0500
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Morten Høgholm <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
> 
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2014, William F Hammond wrote:
> 
>    [...]
> 
>    In the new track with its pertinent user-level diagnostics one could have
>    the LaTeX program print a diagnostic and then exit, forcing the user to
>    correct the problem, one problem at a time.
> 
> sadly, this would discourage me, and
> probably anyone else involved in a
> production setting, from using the
> new track if it is set up unalterably
> this way.  

I agree. This would to me feel like having a misspelled word prevent you from printing out the document past the point of misspelling. Compiling code is one thing, ‘compiling’ a document could be a little more forgiving I think. 

Morten 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2