LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Roozbeh Pournader <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Feb 2001 19:50:20 +0330
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Frank Mittelbach wrote:

> this does not mean that the source input can't be in a more suitable encoding
> and my suggestion is to use the LaTeX internal character representation here
> (and not UTF8) but in some sense either is similarily useful since both
> describe in a unique way the set of characters and both can be converted from
> one into the other.

I would like to suggest UTF8. First of all, they would also be usable with
Omega, and second, parsing UTF8 is easier than parsing LaTeX internal
character representation (LICR?).

--roozbeh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2