LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:11:34 +1030
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
On 04/01/2011, at 8:36 AM, Joseph Wright wrote:

> Working on the galley (see the latest SVN checkin), I find that \box_if_empty:NTF is misleading. The test is for a void box, not an empty one:
> 
> \box_new:N \l_my_box
> \hbox_set:Nn \l_my_box {}
> \box_if_empty:NTF \l_my_box { NOPE } { OOPS }
> 
> I think it should be \box_if_void:NTF - any objections?

Not at all.
Is there a need to have an actual empty test?
Oh wait, this isn't possible, right?

-- Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2