Date:
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 07:03:12 -0500
|
At 11:57 AM 11/19/1999 +0100, you wrote:
>I wrote:
> > no, any TeX using mltex option is independent of encodings. You can
> > use CM, EC, Times, ... what you want with any related encoding.
> > It would be so easy if all formats around the world were done
> > with the mltex option. It's free, standard (as an option can be) and
> > without any danger. But life is different ;=)
>DR> I meant "the brand of TeX you are using is *usually* not
>DR> independent of the (font) encoding you use."
>
>it should. Only few TeX engines don't accept all font encodings,
>which ones?
Windows TeX implementations (other than Y&Y TeX) are limited
to permutations of Windows ANSI encoding for on screen and
non-PS printing. Macintosh TeX implementations are limited
to permutations of Macintosh standard encoding for on screen and
non-PS printing. (This is for text fonts, non-text fonts like CM have
their own hard-wired encoding and are not reencoded).
--
Berthold K.P. Horn [log in to unmask]
|
|
|