Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
Date: |
Fri, 23 May 2014 22:47:01 +0930 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 23 May 2014, at 6:10 am, Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Shouldn't we just allow spaces (and leading | or any other system
>> dependent special
>> syntax) just surrounding any user supplied name by " " to keep it together?
>
> Space behaviour notwithstanding, I think the point here is that the pipe
> input approach is sufficiently different from a 'real' file to deserve a
> separate interface.
One big difference being I think, which I’m stealing from a tex.sx comment I read recently (sorry for the lack of attribution — maybe Heiko?), being that MiKTeX explicitly requires a “-enable-pipes” option passed to pdfTeX to function whereas TeX Live permits pipes with -shell-escape.
I could be wrong but I think this is a bit of an issue because shell-escape-being-enabled can be queried within pdfTeX whereas MiKTeX support for pipes can’t be. This makes it difficult/impossible (?) to provide an equivalent expl3 interface on all platforms.
Having said all this, I think one reason pipes haven’t been used much since their initial inception is a lack of obvious documentation and good user interface. So providing some higher-level support for this functionality could be good incentive to normalise the interface between MiKTeX and TeX Live.
Cheers,
Will
|
|
|