LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Rowley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Feb 2014 11:47:18 +0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (662 bytes) , text/html (1157 bytes)
Hi Bill

An update:

> I believe the answer to the first is "yes".  For one thing, I think the LaTeX being submitted to arXiv (arxiv.org) is improving.  I commonly look at arXiv source and try to run it through tex4ht toward html+mathml with mathjax.  I see success there as a sign of well-structured LaTeX.  But I've not made a systematic investigation on this point.

But Bruce and Gabor have.  They have worked on the whole arXiv (to produce, in particular, very information-rich MathML) as part of the semantic maths project.  So they can probably give you lots of useful data on this and on many other subjects of interest to LATEX-L discussions.

Best,
chris




ATOM RSS1 RSS2