LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Dec 2008 22:25:07 +0000
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Andreas Matthias wrote:

> I disagree. I don't like it at all. Characters and tokens are
> distinct things in terms of TeX.
> 
> LaTeX3 is already far away from TeX. Maybe too far. Don't push
> it even farther away by reinventing terms and definitions.
> 
> "Token list pointer" might not be the most appropriate name but,
> please, don't call it characters.

I think the point here was that a toks is a list of tokens, and so is a
tlp, but they are not the same.  I think we are all happy with _toks for
what TeX calls a toks.  So the question is how to name/describe a macro
used to store tokens (which is currently a tlp).  I'd have called it a
string, but I can see that this causes the same problem as calling the
contents characters.  How about a "token macro" (= _tmac)? (I see that
l3toks describes a toks as a "token register".)  Perhaps this points up
the underlying structure better?
--
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2