 
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Sun, 21 Sep 2014 15:10:21 +0930
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
|
On 15 Sep 2014, at 4:52 pm, Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I don't remember any technical reasons for not doing this: I guess
> primarily we've not needed it often enough.
I think this was discussed back when I first came on board years ago, and naming complexity / interface simplicity relegated it to the chopping room floor. This was probably before we even had selection of conditions in the {p,TF,T,F} style argument.
> Probably this would go into \prg_... as it's only applicable to
> conditionals (we have \prg_new_eq_conditional:NNn and
> \prg_set_eq_conditional:NNn). I guess something like
> \prg_generate_conditional_variant:Nnn would be an appropriate name.
I think another complaint I had at the time was that “\prg_generate_conditional_variant:Nnn” is a pretty big mouthful of a command, but that’s minor :) I don’t think we could come up with a shorter and better name but any ideas?
Cheers,
Will
|
|
|
