LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Timothy Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Jun 1998 04:37:30 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<v03110700b1ada22893b8@[130.237.37.25]> from Hans Aberg at "Jun 17, 98 07:20:22 pm"
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
>   Then the command \math/ as it is defined here parses its argument too see
> if it is a command or a submodule: If it is a command (no slash in it),
> then it merely executes it. So \math/{phi} executes \math/phi, etc. But in
> the submodule case (a slash in the name), \math/{symbol/phi} translates
> into \math/symbol/{phi}; it is then up to the submodule command
> \math/symbol/ to decide how to react.

Does this really mean I'll have to say "\math/phi"
every time I want a \phi ?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2