LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-87BF5758-B8F9-490D-A619-7AA907A4AF90
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 03:58:41 +0700
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Chris Rowley <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (1067 bytes) , text/html (2207 bytes)
"Mind the Gap!"  as they say on The Tube in London (the UK one).

Sent from my iPud (\~/)

> On 21 May 2014, at 02:16, William F Hammond <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:31 AM, David Carlisle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> For that use I'd think
>> a variant declaration which would define \mathbf to flip the mathcodes into the U+1Dxxx block
>> using the base font rather than define it as a swutch to new \fam (\mathgroup)  and  would be useful.
> So long as one minds the gaps in U+1Dxxx (actually the several gaps for which the unicode folk seem to have thought the characters were previously defined in the U+21xx block), though maybe it's not that much of an issue for \mathbf itself as opposed to \mathcal, \mathfrak, and \mathbb.
> At least they were thoughtful enough to leave those slots empty.  :-)
> Just seizing the opportunity to make everyone aware of the gaps.
>         -- Bill
> -- 
> William F Hammond
> Email: [log in to unmask]