"Mind the Gap!"  as they say on The Tube in London (the UK one).


Sent from my iPud (\~/)

> On 21 May 2014, at 02:16, William F Hammond <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:31 AM, David Carlisle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> For that use I'd think
>> a variant declaration which would define \mathbf to flip the mathcodes into the U+1Dxxx block
>> using the base font rather than define it as a swutch to new \fam (\mathgroup)  and  would be useful.
> 
> So long as one minds the gaps in U+1Dxxx (actually the several gaps for which the unicode folk seem to have thought the characters were previously defined in the U+21xx block), though maybe it's not that much of an issue for \mathbf itself as opposed to \mathcal, \mathfrak, and \mathbb.
> 
> At least they were thoughtful enough to leave those slots empty.  :-)
> 
> Just seizing the opportunity to make everyone aware of the gaps.
> 
>         -- Bill
> 
> -- 
> William F Hammond
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> https://www.facebook.com/william.f.hammond
> http://www.albany.edu/~hammond/
>