LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:51:18 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (15 lines)
At 10:25 +0000 2001/02/12, David Carlisle wrote:
>It may be worth noting that unicode 3.1 and 3.2 will (assuming the
>current plans go through) have a lot more (~1500 more, If I recall
>correctly) math characters than unicode 3.0. Actually one of the main
>things missing (currently) are long arrows. We (MathML working group)
>are in touch with the Unicode folks to see if there's any chance of
>those being added as well, although time is getting short for further
>additions to 3.1 and 3.2.

Why do you want to add them? -- The semantic meaning of long arrows is
exactly the same as the short ones (or do you know of a counter example).
-- So a long arrow is a different rendering of a short one.

  Hans Aberg