LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 1997 10:26:31 GMT
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
> Phillip Helbig writes:
>
>  > >   So LaTeX needs not worry about email line length limitations, really.
>  >        ^^^^^
>  > Is there some confusion here?  I'm referring not to LaTeX source, but
>  > rather to email messages to this list.
>
> Maybe. The topic before was the line length in the files of the LaTeX
> distribution.

I mentioned wrapping to 72 characters in the previous thread, which I
started and which is indicated by the change in title.  Line length in
the files of the LaTeX distribution (which also shouldn't be too long)
wasn't MY original topic at all.


--
Phillip Helbig                          Email ... [log in to unmask]
Nuffield Radio Astronomy Laboratories   Tel. ..... +44 1477 571 321 (ext. 297)
Jodrell Bank                            Fax ................. +44 1477 571 618
Macclesfield                            Telex ................. 36149 JODREL G
UK-Cheshire SK11 9DL                    Web .... http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pjh/

My opinions are not necessarily those of NRAL or the University of Manchester.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2