LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Henri Menke <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Jan 2016 17:53:19 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary=001a11346b48dd6a2a05293a01e1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (432 bytes) , test.tex (1911 bytes)
Dear list,

I have implemented a preliminary version of
  \fp_factorial:n and \fp_gamma:n
The current working precision of \fp_gamma:n is limited to 1e-11.

So far, error checking for the argument of factorial is missing and I
don't know how to integrate this into l3fp, especially making these
available in \fp_eval:n as factorial(x) and gamma(x).

If anyone would be so kind as to provide some guidance, I would be
very grateful.

Cheers, Henri


ATOM RSS1 RSS2