LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Robin Fairbairns <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Jun 1997 09:18:45 +0100
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "Wed, 18 Jun 1997 13:59:29 EDT." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
> In any case, I have strong doubts whether what is good for Elsevier
> is necessarily what is good for the latex community or for the
> academic community.

I've no doubt Sebastian has, too.  However, I believe we ignore "the
publishers' attitude" at our peril, and we've got precious few
publishers talking to us just now.

What has LaTeX 3 done, up to now?  Is it merely techniques, or has
some new UI code be written already?  My understanding was the former:
if I'm right, we are well-placed to be thinking the unthinkable right
now.

Robin F

ATOM RSS1 RSS2