LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Jun 1998 12:53:00 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Philip Taylor (RHBNC) writes:
 > How can that work?  Assuming that (e.g.) "\newcommand" is macro ->
 > {... \def ...}, then without a LaTeX equivalent of PostScript's
 > "bind", you still need access to "\def"; and if "\newcommand" is
 > macro -> {... \someconcealedversionofdef ...}, then the user can
 > use "\someconcealedversionofdef" :-(

Stick an @ in the name of the renamed \def.  That's enough to stop
most people.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2