 
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:57:23 +0930
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
|
On 21/09/2010, at 2:50 PM, Arno Trautmann wrote:
> Will Robertson wrote:
>> On 20/09/2010, at 11:27 PM, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
>>
>>> is there actually any need for the :nnn etc versions?
>>
>> Not sure, is there?
>> They seem natural to me; better than nesting multiple :nn commands for more than two ‘and’ branches, say.
>
> But then you’re lost at five ”and“. What about, say
> \bool_and_p:n {\bool1,...,\booln}
> i.e. a list of boolean expressions? (Just for the interface, no idea how
> to implement this in an efficient way)
Why not just use && in the first place?
-- Will
|
|
|
