LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 12:33:31 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
From: David Carlisle <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (18 lines)
On 03/07/2014 09:16, Joseph Wright wrote:
>   3. Are these more complex possibilities needed for \coffins_...?
>      (Currently there is only \coffin_resize:Nnn.)

I suspect not, a classic box just has three associated lengths so that 
pretty much determines
the "packaged" resize combinations.

But for a coffin the equivalent of height/depth is really the y 
coordinates of any handle
relative to the total height; and width similarly can be split by the x 
coordinate of any handle
thus I think there are too many possibilities to wrap these in simple 
named commands and the caller
will need to calculate the scale factors required.

David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2