On 19/09/2011 07:32, Will Robertson wrote:
> Am I mistaken or did \msg_four_spaces: once exist?
> (For when writing messages to the console output.)
> \c_space_tl \c_space_tl \c_space_tl \c_space_tl
> just doesn't have the same ring to it.
> (Happy calling it \msg_indent: or something else if that would be better?)
> Or am I just crazy? I know we don't just want to add new functions at random all the time.
We did have \msg_space:, \msg_two_spaces: and \msg_four_spaces:. The
argument for getting rid of them in that form was that they were not
really functions, so using \c_space_tl seemed equally valid.
With the implementation we have now, you can use "\ " for a space, but
there is an argument for a semantic 'code indent'. So \msg_indent: would
seem to be reasonable.