LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:49:06 +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
<20110101204323.GA14218@khaled-laptop>
Content-Type:
multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig99F97032B816FD64FC777C13"
From:
Arno Trautmann <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1008 bytes) , signature.asc (261 bytes)
Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 08:26:38PM +0000, Joseph Wright wrote:
>> On 01/01/2011 20:18, TeXWorld wrote:
>>> Thank you Joseph.
>>>
>>> Have the LaTeX3 team ever thought of making LaTeX3 only work with LuaTeX
>>> and XeTeX ? Why ? To integrate directly into the format fontspec
>>> functionnalities for instance.
>>
>> We have not started on fonts for LaTeX3 yet, but to cut out pdfTeX
>> would be a pretty extreme move.
> 
> Just wondering, what benefit pdftex have over luatex (with the later
> being an extension of the former),

Currently: speed. luaTeX is quite slow compared to pdfTeX. (A
non-representative test gave me about a factor of 3 for a simple document)
But I still hope that there will be a boost in speed …

> or is it about people who are not
> willing/can't switch to new engine? Do we expect such people to be
> welling/able to switch to latex3 either?

That's what I alway say … With LaTeX3, nobody can (and will) claim
backwards compatibility on machine level.

cheers
Arno



ATOM RSS1 RSS2