LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Benedikt Vitecek <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Sep 2018 16:36:27 +0200
Message-ID:
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DAD22E0E-3037-4F96-B746-695C617A7B71"
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1272 bytes) , text/html (2594 bytes)
Greetings,

I would like to register two package prefixes, but as there was a discussion about prefixes in June (I think)
I also wanted to ask if the prefixes are „okay“ (or if they are too general). Both packages are already
at CTAN for some years now, but changing the prefixes – if necessary – wouldn’t be a problem. Back then
I have chosen the prefixes simply to be equal to the package names.

First would be „tikzsymbols“:
tikzsymbols, tikzsymbols, Ben Vitecek, [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>, https://github.com/Vidabe/tikzsymbols <https://github.com/Vidabe/tikzsymbols>, https://github.com/Vidabe/tikzsymbols <https://github.com/Vidabe/tikzsymbols>, https://github.com/Vidabe/tikzsymbols/issues <https://github.com/Vidabe/tikzsymbols/issues>

Second would be „cooking-units“ with the prefix „cooking_units“
cooking_units, cooking-units, Ben Vitecek, [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>, https://github.com/Vidabe/cooking-units <https://github.com/Vidabe/cooking-units>, https://github.com/Vidabe/cooking-units <https://github.com/Vidabe/cooking-units>, https://github.com/Vidabe/cooking-units/issues <https://github.com/Vidabe/cooking-units/issues>


Ben.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2