Tue, 15 May 2001 10:24:53 +0100
> >>The same should apply to, say, Greek. If I write "barbaros" [well,
> >>imagine it written in Greek] using the same beta, sometimes I would like to
> >>see the first one using a differenf glyph from the second one (a medial
> >>beta, not used currently).
> > And then I suggest that you do this by selecting a (top level) font in
> > which the beta has the medial form, not by using a special \medialbeta
> > command or by requesting that the LICR should incorporate something
> > equivalent to this.
> Thus, we need 2 virtual font for every font encoding. Don't forget
> that iota can be rendered below a letter or "in-line" (2),
> iota and upsilon can be rendered inverted (2), and there is
> the lunate sigma (2). Since these options are independent, are you
> suggesting the creation of 16 (!) vf files and tfm files for every
> font (and encoding)? (And regarding that, Greek is easy compared
> with scripts like Devanagari or Arabic.)
isn't this sort of thing done by ligaturing a "boundary character", so
"bnd" "beta" -> "initial beta"
"sigma" "bnd" -> "terminal sigma"
and so on?
(i've never really understood boundary characters so i may have this
whatever, such behaviour would take the issue beyond the realms that
latex would deal with, since (to first order) there's no control over
ligaturing in macro code.