LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Chris Rowley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Nov 1998 19:19:15 +0100
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Sebastian Rahtz wrote --

> too right. i think the situation you describe is shocking, and I am
> ashamed of my profession. seriously.

In this context, it would be interesting to know whether Elsevier
still budgets about 5-times as much for typestting maths as for
non-technical copy?

Here it is diffiuclt to tell whether we still do, since we went electronic
and in-house simultaneously.


chris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2