LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Timothy Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Nov 1998 17:46:55 +0000
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>; from William F. Hammond on Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 12:05:53PM -0500
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
On Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 12:05:53PM -0500, William F. Hammond wrote:

> Phillip Helbig writes:
>
> > There are a lot of very good cathedral products out there which are
> > very good and chugging away and are very successful but one never
> > hears anything about them.
>
> I do not doubt this point.  In fact, there is one, a computer
> algebra system, that I use.

I'm surprised no-one in this somewhat philosophical discussion
has mentioned one very eminent "cathedral product",
namely tex itself.

No bazaar for DK.

--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
tel: +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2