LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Fairbairns <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:47:17 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
sebastian quoting philip helbig:

>  > I think a bazaar approach to LaTeX would make updating even more
>  > difficult than it is now.  (Standard LaTeX is OK, but stuff in contrib
>  > has to be done pretty much by hand.)  And I think the documentation and
>  > user-level syntax could be more uniform than it is now.
>
> sorry, but i think thats an argument for Bazaar. as it stands now, "contrib"
> is beyond the pale, roll your own, unknown, orphan. it needs bringing
> into the fold.

there were plans, once upon a time, remember.  that's why there's
`supported' and `other'.

but what with writers of high-quality stuff (such as donald arseneau)
going for other/misc for most submissions, and the fact that pretty
much anything goes to supported unless the author claims he really
doesn't want it, the distinction has rather faded.

r

ATOM RSS1 RSS2