LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:44:30 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Ulrike Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (17 lines)
Am Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:18:34 +0000 schrieb Joseph Wright:

>> You naturally loose potential key names. And there is the danger
>> that there is somewhere a package which relies on the current
>> implementation. 
> 
> I assume you mean that some package might be relying on the spaces in
> some way (so two keys differing only in a space in the name).

Yes. Not that it would be a good idea to have two such keys and I
don't think that it is very probable. 


-- 
Ulrike Fischer 
http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2