LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ulrike Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:44:30 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Am Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:18:34 +0000 schrieb Joseph Wright:

>> You naturally loose potential key names. And there is the danger
>> that there is somewhere a package which relies on the current
>> implementation. 
> 
> I assume you mean that some package might be relying on the spaces in
> some way (so two keys differing only in a space in the name).

Yes. Not that it would be a good idea to have two such keys and I
don't think that it is very probable. 


-- 
Ulrike Fischer 
http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2