LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 08:19:50 +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Will Robertson wrote:
> Just to clarify, are you happy with the
> collections/type/template/instance "hierarchy" in template? Barring some
> improvements we've discussed such as editing instances and template
> defaults, I think the broad concept works.

Yes, all seems to make sense there. When things do get finalised, we
need to have all of this laid out in the documentation nicely!

> When it comes down to it, it matters less what syntax we use for
> defining templates and more what the template setup allows us to do.

True, but as templates will be used a lot in LaTeX3, a good interface is
also important.
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2