LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:50:53 +0000
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (25 lines)
On 26/02/2016 11:37, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> Am Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:27:01 +0000 schrieb Joseph Wright:
>> New prefixes registered as detailed below.
> which triggered me to look at the list.
> And imho in my case the order is wrong (the prefix is UF and the
> package citeall). Also my name is not written correctly. 

Correct, though looking at the code the prefix is "UFca" (which is what
I've put).

> It also reminds me of a question: Is there a prefix pattern which
> will never be registered so that one can safely use it in
> local/private definitions?

We can only *ask* we can't *tell*, but I'd probably strongly discourage
"foo", "tmp", "local", "mypkg" and similar 'throw away' prefixes. I'll
see if the team feel we should register a prefix specifically for this
purpose ('Local additions not to be distributed').