Frank Mittelbach wrote:
> Joseph Wright writes:
> > 2) How should the missing three (plus any others) be named. The current
> > idea is, I think, something like:
> > \endlinechar \l_char_endline_int
> > \evereof \l_ior_eof_toks
> > \scantokens \tlist_rescan:n
> > Is this logical: are there any other suggestions?
> so for now (see other post) I would only assign \endlinechar and \scantokens
> and the names there look fine to me
The reason I'm interested in \everyeof as well is for using \scantokens
in a context such as:
% Some catcode changes
which fails without the \everyeof setting. That I know of there is no
way to "bundle up" the various components, so without access to
\everyeof, \scantokens is not much use (at least to me).