Will Robertson wrote:
> If you're unsure about .set:N, perhaps it's better to drop it for now. I
> mean, *I* like it, but others have had mixed reactions. (You've been
> looking at l3keys recently, Manuel? Any thoughts?)
Probably a good idea. I'd prefer to have something we can all agree
stays, then add .set:N back later if it is wanted. Expect an update later.