Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jul 2023 19:47:35 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
David Carlisle
<[log in to unmask]> writes:
> On 28/07/2023 18:25, LARONDE Thierry wrote:
>> Why in this case not having requested a \filefind primitive, with an
>> argument specifying a required extension (an empty string if to be
>> taken as is), and using the return value with other primitives (size,
>> moddate, md5, dump) doing no search and no extension (very "primitive"
>> primitives)?
>
> you are asking on a latex list, but this is not a latex issue.
>
> \pdffilesize has had this behaviour in pdftex for decades, and another
> primitive isn't needed.
As a side comment: "another primitive isn't needed" is kind of a
fundamental LaTeX mantra: as opposed to LuaTeX/Context, traditional
LaTeX development has always taken the position of being "downstream",
making do with whatever the engines (with a particularly long and
thorough focus on the original TeX engine) provide.
--
David "\romannumeral" Kastrup
|
|
|