LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lars Hellström <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 25 Feb 2001 16:19:14 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
At 18.45 +0100 01-02-24, Chris Rowley wrote:
>Can we agree that one question we need to ask is:
>
>  what is LaTeX's Internal Representation of all `math-mode token lists'?

Yes.

With the current LaTeX character handling, there is an ambiguity on the
input side---hence my remarks about that---but the matter should rather be
delt with on the output side. I very much agree with:

>We should probably pin this down before venturing into Unicode for
>math-mode.

Lars Hellström

ATOM RSS1 RSS2