Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 2 Jan 2011 22:32:09 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 02/01/2011 18:49, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> Again, my main question is: if they can keep doing what they do right
> now with pdftex (since luatex should be supporting all of it), why not
> give the extra functionality to the people who want/need it; programming
> to the least common denominator is just tying the users of new engines
> by the limitation of old ones.
>
> I'm not suggesting that any one do any thing, I'm just trying to
> understand.
As I said before, changes are likely to be driven by code requirements.
If there is a point where there is something that we want to do (i.e. a
core LaTeX3 function rather than something which is optional) that
cannot be done with pdfTeX, then there will be some 'vigorous
discussion' and hopefully a sensible outcome.
Give me a few months to get other jobs done, then start on fonts, and
we'll see what happens :-)
> AFAIK the startup delay was a misconfiguration of luatex formats in
> texlive2009 (and may be before) and it got fixed in texlive2010.
I'll have to do some testing (I do have TL 2010).
--
Joseph Wright
|
|
|