Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2014 15:45:46 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d971b8b90a8050439842c |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'll just chime in and say that this topic is *awfully* similar to
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.latex.latex3/3363.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Denis Bitouzé <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> among others, `.value_forbidden:` and `.value_required:` key properties
> from `l3keys` package are useful: they let us specify that a given key,
> when used, either cannot or must receive a value.
>
> What could be useful as well is a key property, say `.required:`, that
> would
> specify that the corresponding key /has/ to be used. This could be helpful
> for
> instance in the case of a document command `\MyModuleSetup` for setting up
> a module `mymodule`:
>
> \DeclareDocumentCommand \MyModuleSetup { m }
> { \keys_set:nn { mymodule } { #1 } }
>
> where some module property /has/ to be specified.
>
> I know this can be achieved with something like test of existence of
> some tokenlist and message emitted in case of nonexistence but a high
> level key property for this could be nice.
>
> May I ask what is your opinion about that?
>
> Thanks in anticipation.
> --
> Denis
>
--
Sean Allred
|
|
|